Acute Care HospitalsFor-profitEmergency servicesBirthing friendly

ST DAVID'S SOUTH AUSTIN MEDICAL CENTER

901 WEST BEN WHITE BLVD, AUSTIN, TX, 78704 · (512) 448-7107

CMS facility ID 450713

CMS overall rating
3 / 5
Rating 3 of 5
Measures reported
101
across 5 measure groups
Patient survey rows
68
HCAHPS responses

How this hospital compares, by group

Counts published by CMS: how many of its measures were better, no different, or worse than the national average.

Measure group comparison counts
GroupBetterNo differentWorseMeasures reported
Mortality0718
Safety2507
Readmission18211

"Compared to National" labels are published by CMS itself. This site displays them as issued and does not derive or re-rank them.

Healthcare-associated infections

Infections patients acquired while in hospital. 36 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)Better than the National Benchmark0.065——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.003——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter DaysBetter than the National Benchmark10526——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed CasesBetter than the National Benchmark1——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted CasesBetter than the National Benchmark15.453——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.319——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)No different from national0.788——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitNo different from national0.366——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed CasesNo different from national8——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted CasesNo different from national10.156——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national1.496——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device DaysNo different from national9383——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)Better than the National Benchmark0.209——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.116——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed CasesBetter than the National Benchmark13——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient DaysBetter than the National Benchmark102463——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted CasesBetter than the National Benchmark62.238——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.348——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA BacteremiaNo different from national1.123——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence LimitNo different from national0.522——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed CasesNo different from national8——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient DaysNo different from national108372——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted CasesNo different from national7.124——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national2.132——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures—80——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases—0——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases—0.698——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon SurgeryNo different from national1.188——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence LimitNo different from national0.552——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of ProceduresNo different from national248——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed CasesNo different from national8——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted CasesNo different from national6.732——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national2.257——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Complications and deaths

Rates of death and serious complications for common conditions, compared with the national average. 20 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rateNo different from national0.960.04 – 1.881,5012022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events compositeNo different from national0.980.7 – 1.27—2022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complicationsNo different from national169.22122.08 – 216.361072022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Death rate for CABG surgery patientsNo different from national2.71.3 – 5.7932022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for COPD patientsNo different from national8.95.7 – 13.8962022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for heart attack patientsNo different from national10.98.1 – 14.51722022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for heart failure patientsNo different from national10.67.2 – 14.94842022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for pneumonia patientsNo different from national18.313.3 – 24.65942022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for stroke patientsNo different from national11.47.8 – 16.62682023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality RateNo different from national4.13.6 – 4.94,5292024-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rateNo different from national0.130 – 0.318,5972022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rateNo different from national0.270.08 – 0.468,5362022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rateNo different from national1.960.12 – 3.812,2492022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rateNo different from national1.320 – 2.867172022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rateNo different from national1.660.29 – 3.032,1402022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative respiratory failure rateWorse Than the National Rate16.0310.14 – 21.927612022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative sepsis rateNo different from national3.610.3 – 6.937322022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative wound dehiscence rateNo different from national1.890.44 – 3.354342022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Pressure ulcer rateNo different from national0.550 – 1.146,8482022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patientsNo different from national4.92.8 – 8.6632023-04-01 → 2025-03-31

Medicare spending per beneficiary

What Medicare paid per patient, relative to the national average. This is a Medicare figure — not what a patient pays. 1 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary)—1.06——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Timely and effective care

How quickly and reliably the hospital delivered recommended care. 30 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/FlutterElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 2Electronic Clinical Quality Measure—93—2102024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shockSepsis Care—79—1702024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—146—4512024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before being transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—138—4182024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time psychiatric/mental health patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—219—262024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Discharged on Antithrombotic TherapyElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Emergency department volumeEmergency Department—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patientsColonoscopy care—90—632024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite ScoreElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis DocumentedElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk ScreeningElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition AssessmentElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care PlanElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Head CT resultsEmergency Department—88—172024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Healthcare workers given influenza vaccinationHealthcare Personnel Vaccination—50—3,8872024-10-01 → 2025-03-31
Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse EventsElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Hospital Harm - Severe HyperglycemiaElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Hospital Harm - Severe HypoglycemiaElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract SurgeryCataract surgery outcome—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism ProphylaxisElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—98—1,7332024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Left before being seenEmergency Department—1—93,7682024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)Electronic Clinical Quality Measure—0—282024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent PrescribingElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—14—5,0532024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Septic Shock 3-Hour BundleSepsis Care—86—562024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Septic Shock 6-Hour BundleSepsis Care—100—402024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Severe Sepsis 3-Hour BundleSepsis Care—86—1712024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Severe Sepsis 6-Hour BundleSepsis Care—99—1002024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Venous Thromboembolism ProphylaxisElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—93—11,7322024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Unplanned hospital visits

How often patients came back to hospital unexpectedly after discharge. 14 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national14.612.2 – 17.42522023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national20.417.5 – 23.77532023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for heart attack patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges-6.1-34.5 – 371832022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for heart failure patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges-20.2-47.3 – 21.95562022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for pneumonia patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges-2.3-22.1 – 22.86002022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)—Not reported——2024-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national1714.5 – 19.78822023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyNo different from national5.63.4 – 8.8292024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyNo different from national14.29.6 – 20.1292024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacementNo different from national7.24.7 – 10.7652023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of readmission for CABGNo different from national9.77 – 13.21342023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patientsNo different from national18.815.9 – 22.11792023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)No different from national12.59.3 – 16.63392022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgeryNo different from national1.10.9 – 1.45822024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Score units differ between measures (rates, ratios, and Medicare dollars per beneficiary). Each measure is shown with its own name and reporting period; do not compare scores across measures.

Patient experience (HCAHPS)

Survey responses from patients, as published by CMS. Star ratings are 1–5; a blank means CMS withheld it.

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean

Not rated
Room was "always" clean76%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean

Not rated
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean5%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean

Not rated
Room was "usually" clean19%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Cleanliness - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Cleanliness - star rating

4 / 5 — Rating 4 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "always" communicated well76%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Nurse communication - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well7%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Nurse communication - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "usually" communicated well17%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "always" communicated well76%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Doctor communication - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well9%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Doctor communication - star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "usually" communicated well15%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "always" explained56%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Communication about medicines - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained24%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Communication about medicines - star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained20%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Discharge information - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients this information16%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Discharge information - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information84%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge18%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge82%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand71%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand10%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand19%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "always" listened carefully75%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully9%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "usually" listened carefully16%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect82%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect7%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect11%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)10%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)24%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)66%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Overall hospital rating - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Overall hospital rating - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for

Not rated
Staff "always" explained new medications70%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications13%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained new medications17%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand72%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand8%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand20%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "always" listened carefully73%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully7%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "usually" listened carefully20%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect82%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night

Not rated
"Always" quiet at night57%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night

Not rated
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night10%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night

Not rated
"Usually" quiet at night33%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Quietness - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Quietness - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital

Not rated
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)8%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital

Not rated
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital70%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Recommend hospital - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital

Not rated
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital22%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Recommend hospital - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "always" explained possible side effects42%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects35%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects23%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Summary star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms14%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms86%

574 completed surveys · response rate 16% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Missing measures are not poor results

CMS suppresses a measure when too few cases were reported for the result to be reliable — common for smaller hospitals. A blank means not reported, which is different from a poor result. Hospitals with more blanks are not necessarily worse.

This is not medical advice

These are historical, aggregate measures about an institution. They do not describe the care any individual will receive, and they cannot account for your condition.

Talk to a clinician about your own care. In an emergency, call your local emergency number.

Other Acute Care Hospitals in TX

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Provider Data Catalog (data updated 2026-07-22) — https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/ · Data last updated 2026-09-27