Acute Care HospitalsFor-profitEmergency servicesBirthing friendly

PARIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

865 DESHONG DR, PARIS, TX, 75460 · (903) 785-4521

CMS facility ID 450196

CMS overall rating
1 / 5
Lowest
Measures reported
101
across 5 measure groups
Patient survey rows
68
HCAHPS responses

How this hospital compares, by group

Counts published by CMS: how many of its measures were better, no different, or worse than the national average.

Measure group comparison counts
GroupBetterNo differentWorseMeasures reported
Mortality0707
Safety1607
Readmission0718

"Compared to National" labels are published by CMS itself. This site displays them as issued and does not derive or re-rank them.

Healthcare-associated infections

Infections patients acquired while in hospital. 36 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)No different from national0.406——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitNo different from national0.068——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter DaysNo different from national4828——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed CasesNo different from national2——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted CasesNo different from national4.931——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national1.34——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)No different from national0.222——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitNo different from national0.011——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed CasesNo different from national1——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted CasesNo different from national4.502——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national1.095——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device DaysNo different from national4818——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)Better than the National Benchmark0.087——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.004——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed CasesBetter than the National Benchmark1——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient DaysBetter than the National Benchmark30252——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted CasesBetter than the National Benchmark11.535——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.428——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA BacteremiaNo different from national0.592——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence LimitNo different from national0.03——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed CasesNo different from national1——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient DaysNo different from national31546——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted CasesNo different from national1.69——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national2.918——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures—66——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases—1——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases—0.668——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon SurgeryNo different from national0——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence LimitNo different from nationalNot reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of ProceduresNo different from national59——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed CasesNo different from national0——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted CasesNo different from national1.685——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national1.778——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Complications and deaths

Rates of death and serious complications for common conditions, compared with the national average. 20 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rateNo different from national1.190.17 – 2.224942022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events compositeNo different from national0.790.4 – 1.17—2022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complicationsNo different from national191.77134.13 – 249.41272022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Death rate for CABG surgery patients—Not reported——2022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for COPD patientsNo different from national11.57.2 – 17.21592022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for heart attack patientsNo different from national13.410 – 17.62002022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for heart failure patientsNo different from national11.67.8 – 16.93182022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for pneumonia patientsNo different from national17.312.6 – 23.84552022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for stroke patientsNo different from national14.89.7 – 231482023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality RateWorse Than the National Rate5.24.2 – 62,3052024-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rateNo different from national0.170 – 0.394,9542022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rateNo different from national0.350.15 – 0.554,8522022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rateNo different from national2.860.63 – 5.091,0462022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rateNo different from national1.60 – 3.34362022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rateNo different from national2.240.65 – 3.841,0282022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative respiratory failure rateNo different from national6.230 – 14.534452022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative sepsis rateNo different from national5.181.21 – 9.154222022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative wound dehiscence rateNo different from national1.990.5 – 3.482022022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Pressure ulcer rateNo different from national0.260 – 1.112,9722022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patientsNo different from national4.12.2 – 7.41772023-04-01 → 2025-03-31

Medicare spending per beneficiary

What Medicare paid per patient, relative to the national average. This is a Medicare figure — not what a patient pays. 1 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary)—1.06——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Timely and effective care

How quickly and reliably the hospital delivered recommended care. 30 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/FlutterElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 2Electronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shockSepsis Care—52—1222024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—131—3712024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before being transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—322—142024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—124—3532024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time psychiatric/mental health patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Discharged on Antithrombotic TherapyElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Emergency department volumeEmergency Department—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patientsColonoscopy care—100—702024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite ScoreElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis DocumentedElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk ScreeningElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition AssessmentElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care PlanElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Head CT resultsEmergency Department—82—112024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Healthcare workers given influenza vaccinationHealthcare Personnel Vaccination—78—9582024-10-01 → 2025-03-31
Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse EventsElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—0—4,2152024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Hospital Harm - Severe HyperglycemiaElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—10—8,5472024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Hospital Harm - Severe HypoglycemiaElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—1—1,7052024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract SurgeryCataract surgery outcome—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism ProphylaxisElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Left before being seenEmergency Department—3—30,1722024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)Electronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent PrescribingElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—14—1,8702024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Septic Shock 3-Hour BundleSepsis Care—64—422024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Septic Shock 6-Hour BundleSepsis Care—92—132024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Severe Sepsis 3-Hour BundleSepsis Care—66—1222024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Severe Sepsis 6-Hour BundleSepsis Care—98—482024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Venous Thromboembolism ProphylaxisElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Unplanned hospital visits

How often patients came back to hospital unexpectedly after discharge. 14 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national14.211.8 – 16.92092023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national22.519.6 – 25.85352023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for heart attack patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges-1.4-39.5 – 56.51832022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for heart failure patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges9-29.5 – 594132022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for pneumonia patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges-5.6-30.8 – 27.75212022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)—Not reported——2024-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national18.716.2 – 21.56062023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyNumber of Cases Too SmallNot reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyNumber of Cases Too SmallNot reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacementNo different from national4.73 – 7.32012023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of readmission for CABG—Not reported——2023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patientsNo different from national21.818.5 – 25.42402023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)No different from national13.710.5 – 17.89912022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgeryNo different from national1.30.9 – 1.71742024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Score units differ between measures (rates, ratios, and Medicare dollars per beneficiary). Each measure is shown with its own name and reporting period; do not compare scores across measures.

Patient experience (HCAHPS)

Survey responses from patients, as published by CMS. Star ratings are 1–5; a blank means CMS withheld it.

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean

Not rated
Room was "always" clean65%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean

Not rated
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean12%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean

Not rated
Room was "usually" clean23%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Cleanliness - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Cleanliness - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "always" communicated well75%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Nurse communication - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well7%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Nurse communication - star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "usually" communicated well18%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "always" communicated well74%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Doctor communication - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well8%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Doctor communication - star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "usually" communicated well18%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "always" explained59%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Communication about medicines - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained22%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Communication about medicines - star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained19%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Discharge information - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients this information19%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Discharge information - star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information81%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge20%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge80%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand68%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand11%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand21%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "always" listened carefully72%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully9%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "usually" listened carefully19%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect81%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect5%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)16%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)28%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)56%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Overall hospital rating - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Overall hospital rating - star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for

Not rated
Staff "always" explained new medications73%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications11%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained new medications16%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand71%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand9%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand20%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "always" listened carefully71%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully6%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "usually" listened carefully23%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect81%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect5%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night

Not rated
"Always" quiet at night58%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night

Not rated
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night9%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night

Not rated
"Usually" quiet at night33%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Quietness - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Quietness - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital

Not rated
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)11%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital

Not rated
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital54%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Recommend hospital - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital

Not rated
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital35%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Recommend hospital - star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "always" explained possible side effects45%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects33%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects22%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Summary star rating

2 / 5 — Rating 2 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms17%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms83%

1,114 completed surveys · response rate 17% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Missing measures are not poor results

CMS suppresses a measure when too few cases were reported for the result to be reliable — common for smaller hospitals. A blank means not reported, which is different from a poor result. Hospitals with more blanks are not necessarily worse.

This is not medical advice

These are historical, aggregate measures about an institution. They do not describe the care any individual will receive, and they cannot account for your condition.

Talk to a clinician about your own care. In an emergency, call your local emergency number.

Other Acute Care Hospitals in TX

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Provider Data Catalog (data updated 2026-07-22) — https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/ · Data last updated 2026-09-27