Acute Care HospitalsNon-profit — privateEmergency servicesBirthing friendly

UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF PRINCETON AT PLAINSBORO

ONE-FIVE PLAINSBORO ROAD, PLAINSBORO, NJ, 08536 · (609) 853-6500

CMS facility ID 310010

CMS overall rating
4 / 5
Rating 4 of 5
Measures reported
101
across 5 measure groups
Patient survey rows
68
HCAHPS responses

How this hospital compares, by group

Counts published by CMS: how many of its measures were better, no different, or worse than the national average.

Measure group comparison counts
GroupBetterNo differentWorseMeasures reported
Mortality1607
Safety2507
Readmission17210

"Compared to National" labels are published by CMS itself. This site displays them as issued and does not derive or re-rank them.

Healthcare-associated infections

Infections patients acquired while in hospital. 36 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards)No different from national0.518——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitNo different from national0.165——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter DaysNo different from national6094——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed CasesNo different from national4——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted CasesNo different from national7.724——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national1.249——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards)Better than the National Benchmark0——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence LimitBetter than the National BenchmarkNot reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed CasesBetter than the National Benchmark0——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted CasesBetter than the National Benchmark5.546——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.54——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device DaysBetter than the National Benchmark5423——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff)Better than the National Benchmark0.521——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.29——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed CasesBetter than the National Benchmark13——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient DaysBetter than the National Benchmark58380——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted CasesBetter than the National Benchmark24.945——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.869——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA BacteremiaNo different from national1.848——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence LimitNo different from national0.808——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed CasesNo different from national7——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient DaysNo different from national64877——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted CasesNo different from national3.788——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence LimitNo different from national3.655——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures—80——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases—1——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases—0.578——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon SurgeryBetter than the National Benchmark0——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence LimitBetter than the National BenchmarkNot reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of ProceduresBetter than the National Benchmark157——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed CasesBetter than the National Benchmark0——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted CasesBetter than the National Benchmark3.874——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence LimitBetter than the National Benchmark0.773——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Complications and deaths

Rates of death and serious complications for common conditions, compared with the national average. 20 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rateNo different from national0.760 – 1.71,4552022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events compositeNo different from national0.850.53 – 1.18—2022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complicationsNo different from national180.76124.39 – 237.14502022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Death rate for CABG surgery patients—Not reported——2022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for COPD patientsNo different from national8.65.5 – 13.41772022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for heart attack patientsNo different from national118.2 – 14.52212022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for heart failure patientsNo different from national9.86.7 – 14.56902022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for pneumonia patientsNo different from national10.97.5 – 15.43752022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Death rate for stroke patientsNo different from national8.75.8 – 12.72482023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality RateBetter Than the National Rate32.5 – 3.63,5182024-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rateNo different from national0.140 – 0.348,8042022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rateNo different from national0.230.05 – 0.428,7362022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rateNo different from national3.661.61 – 5.711,2042022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rateNo different from national1.450 – 3.075292022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rateNo different from national2.330.8 – 3.861,3642022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative respiratory failure rateNo different from national8.30.82 – 15.795072022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative sepsis rateNo different from national5.651.79 – 9.52572022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Postoperative wound dehiscence rateNo different from national1.870.43 – 3.323892022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Pressure ulcer rateNo different from national0.280 – 0.887,7702022-07-01 → 2024-06-30
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patientsNo different from national5.32.7 – 101472023-04-01 → 2025-03-31

Medicare spending per beneficiary

What Medicare paid per patient, relative to the national average. This is a Medicare figure — not what a patient pays. 1 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Medicare hospital spending per patient (Medicare Spending per Beneficiary)—1——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Timely and effective care

How quickly and reliably the hospital delivered recommended care. 30 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/FlutterElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 2Electronic Clinical Quality Measure—92—1872024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shockSepsis Care—71—1222024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—225—4082024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before being transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—Not reported——2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, excluding patients transferred to another facility or psychiatric care/mental health patients. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—221—3792024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Average (median) time psychiatric/mental health patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is betterEmergency Department—445—272024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Discharged on Antithrombotic TherapyElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—97—1972024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Emergency department volumeEmergency Department—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patientsColonoscopy care—96—1042024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite ScoreElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis DocumentedElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk ScreeningElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition AssessmentElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care PlanElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Head CT resultsEmergency Department—60—152024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Healthcare workers given influenza vaccinationHealthcare Personnel Vaccination—99—5,7752024-10-01 → 2025-03-31
Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse EventsElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Hospital Harm - Severe HyperglycemiaElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—9—16,3142024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Hospital Harm - Severe HypoglycemiaElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract SurgeryCataract surgery outcome—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism ProphylaxisElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Left before being seenEmergency Department—1—59,3482024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)Electronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent PrescribingElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—18—2,9492024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Septic Shock 3-Hour BundleSepsis Care—92—382024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Septic Shock 6-Hour BundleSepsis Care—87—312024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Severe Sepsis 3-Hour BundleSepsis Care—85—1232024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Severe Sepsis 6-Hour BundleSepsis Care—90—702024-10-01 → 2025-09-30
Venous Thromboembolism ProphylaxisElectronic Clinical Quality Measure—Not reported——2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Unplanned hospital visits

How often patients came back to hospital unexpectedly after discharge. 14 measures.

MeasureCompared to nationalScore95% intervalCasesPeriod
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national13.911.1 – 17.11452023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Heart failure (HF) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national20.116.9 – 23.87482023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for heart attack patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges19.9-17.1 – 80.61402022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for heart failure patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges-14.9-40.2 – 187612022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hospital return days for pneumonia patientsAverage Days per 100 Discharges-19.6-37.2 – 2.13882022-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission Measure (HWR)—Not reported——2024-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Pneumonia (PN) 30-Day Readmission RateNo different from national16.814.2 – 19.94242023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of emergency department (ED) visits for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyNo different from national4.63 – 6.91362024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Rate of inpatient admissions for patients receiving outpatient chemotherapyNo different from national128.6 – 16.11362024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Rate of readmission after hip/knee replacementNo different from national5.53.4 – 8.41662023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of readmission for CABG—Not reported——2023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patientsNo different from national20.617.3 – 24.42332023-07-01 → 2025-06-30
Rate of unplanned hospital visits after colonoscopy (per 1,000 colonoscopies)No different from national14.111.1 – 17.72,0732022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Ratio of unplanned hospital visits after hospital outpatient surgeryBetter than expected0.60.5 – 0.81,8672024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Score units differ between measures (rates, ratios, and Medicare dollars per beneficiary). Each measure is shown with its own name and reporting period; do not compare scores across measures.

Patient experience (HCAHPS)

Survey responses from patients, as published by CMS. Star ratings are 1–5; a blank means CMS withheld it.

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean

Not rated
Room was "always" clean73%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean

Not rated
Room was "sometimes" or "never" clean8%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean

Not rated
Room was "usually" clean19%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Cleanliness - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Cleanliness - star rating

4 / 5 — Rating 4 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "always" communicated well79%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Nurse communication - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" communicated well5%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Nurse communication - star rating

4 / 5 — Rating 4 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well

Not rated
Nurses "usually" communicated well16%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "always" communicated well76%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Doctor communication - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" communicated well7%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Doctor communication - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well

Not rated
Doctors "usually" communicated well17%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "always" explained63%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Communication about medicines - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained18%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Communication about medicines - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained19%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Discharge information - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients this information16%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Discharge information - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients this information84%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients information about help after discharge16%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about help after discharge84%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "always" explained things so they could understand74%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand8%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Doctors "usually" explained things so they could understand18%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "always" listened carefully73%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully7%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Doctors "usually" listened carefully20%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "always" treated them with courtesy and respect80%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect6%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Doctors "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect14%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "6" or lower (low)10%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "7" or "8" (medium)19%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Not rated
Patients who gave a rating of "9" or "10" (high)71%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Overall hospital rating - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Overall hospital rating - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for

Not rated
Staff "always" explained new medications78%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained new medications6%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained new medications16%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "always" explained things so they could understand75%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" explained things so they could understand6%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand

Not rated
Nurses "usually" explained things so they could understand19%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "always" listened carefully77%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" listened carefully3%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them

Not rated
Nurses "usually" listened carefully20%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "always" treated them with courtesy and respect85%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "sometimes" or "never" treated them with courtesy and respect4%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect

Not rated
Nurses "usually" treated them with courtesy and respect11%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night

Not rated
"Always" quiet at night55%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night

Not rated
"Sometimes" or "never" quiet at night12%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night

Not rated
"Usually" quiet at night33%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Quietness - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Quietness - star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital

Not rated
"NO", patients would not recommend the hospital (they probably would not or definitely would not recommend it)5%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital

Not rated
"YES", patients would definitely recommend the hospital75%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Recommend hospital - linear mean score

Not rated

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital

Not rated
"YES", patients would probably recommend the hospital20%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Recommend hospital - star rating

4 / 5 — Rating 4 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "always" explained possible side effects48%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "sometimes" or "never" explained possible side effects30%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects

Not rated
Staff "usually" explained possible side effects22%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Summary star rating

3 / 5 — Rating 3 of 5

No answer breakdown reported.

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge

Not rated
No, staff "did not" give patients information about possible symptoms15%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge

Not rated
Yes, staff "did" give patients information about possible symptoms85%

422 completed surveys · response rate 24% · 2024-10-01 → 2025-09-30

Missing measures are not poor results

CMS suppresses a measure when too few cases were reported for the result to be reliable — common for smaller hospitals. A blank means not reported, which is different from a poor result. Hospitals with more blanks are not necessarily worse.

This is not medical advice

These are historical, aggregate measures about an institution. They do not describe the care any individual will receive, and they cannot account for your condition.

Talk to a clinician about your own care. In an emergency, call your local emergency number.

Other Acute Care Hospitals in NJ

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Provider Data Catalog (data updated 2026-07-22) — https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/ · Data last updated 2026-09-27